Introduction The last parliamentary elections in Palestine, which gave an important victory to the militant group named Hamas, involve a new deal in the Middle East. The international community did not envisage this configuration, betting on a renewal of Fatah, the party of president Mahmud Abbas. The threat that the Hamas’victory blocks the peace’s process is real. In fact, this organization advocates the destruction of Israel and refuses its obligations under the roadmap to which Israel and Palestinian’s Authority are committed. Sources The BBC is innovative, progressive and pioneering - the British Broadcasting Corporation has proved a powerful force in the 20th century - providing entertainment, education and information, and captivating millions of viewers and listen. According to them, the BBC News Online is the best of BBC News on the Web and it’s an unrivalled resource of authoritative fact and comment. The Times is one of the oldest British newspapers, created towards the end of the eighteenth century. It has been bought by Rupert Murdoch, the owner of The Sun, Sky TV and Fox News. The Guardian is a left-wing daily British newspaper, specialized in in-depth analysis and comment on UK and world news, politics, business (the weekly version: the Observer).
The Times, January 30th The price of Hamas's victory in the Palestinian parliamentary elections started to become clear today. BBC News, January 30th Hamas urges EU not to end funding The Hamas leaders have appealed to the European Union not to halt funding to the Palestinian Authority following the militant group's election victory. The Guardian, January 30th The fact that Hamas does not, and will not, recognise the legitimacy of the state of Israel does not mean that Hamas is not capable of negotiating a peace deal that would end the bloodshed. However, Israel is a reality and that is why Hamas is willing to deal with that reality in a manner that is compatible with its principles. Personal statement The Hamas victory offers two prospects which could have opposed consequences for peace in the Middle East. If Hamas renounces to violence against Israel and accepts the roadmap’s conditions, the peace process could be reinforced. In fact, Hamas has always been an obstacle for peace because of its terrorists activities against Israel. However, we can suppose that the arrival on power and the international’s pressure urge Hamas to abandon its most contestable principles. In opposite, if Hamas remains on its positions, the situation could quickly degenerate. Negotiations would become impossible between the Palestinians and the Israelis. Moreover, in this hypothesis, the international aid will be stopped and we can imagine that other sources of funding, more obscure, will ensue. The future will reveal if Hamas uses its democratic legitimacy to justify extremism or pragmatism. |