Human Resources
This freedom of speech and professionalism
are said to be inherited from the BBC Arabic service, for a filiation is often
made between the latter and al-Jazeera. Indeed, in 1995, as the BBC redaction
broadcasted a critical documentary about the Saudi royal family, the king
of Saudia decided to shut down the service. Since the Kingdom financed the
BBC throught one of its channels, Orbit and is Arab-Sat's main shareholder,
the move was easy to make.
By then, Âl-Thani attracted these journalists with avantageous work
conditions (wages, freedom of speech, no governemental interference). As a
sign of his good willing, Âl-Thani abolished the omnipotent and censorial
Ministry of Information (1995). Hence, most of the journalists working for
this channel were formed in the BBC newsroom, reknowed worldwidely for its
professionalism and eagerness for objectivity.
Concerning this competition
between the two states, a geopolitical aspect of the question has to be highlighted.
The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) has always had hegemonic ambitions in the
region. Some emirates, like Qatar, Bahrein or the UAE have tried to prevent
any Saudi moves by allying with the USA. Even in the crucial field of telecommunications,
the KSA dominated the regional communication order by investing colossal amounts
of money to finance "off-shore" TV channels (like MBC, that has
recently moved from London to Dubai Media City or Orbit and ART in Roma).
The creation of al-Jazeera can be analysed, retrospectively, as a reaction
to this situation. So as to make it even more competitive than its Saudi competitors,
Âl-Thani garanteed a large manoeuvre margin for the journalists to give
an information of good quality.
Once the newscast gathered, a transponder was needed to launch the channel. The only one available on Arab-Sat was a transponder with a weak signal. But in 1998, al-Jazeera changed its transponder for a more powerful one. This really put it on the map: by using the commonly used C-band transponder , the channel was more convenient to reach: most of the largest satellite channel are oriented on this one (zapping is therefore more appropriate since the dish does not have to move to capt the satellite signal).


Freedom of speech and competition.
The emir of Qatar had this ambitious political move to keep his word and to let these journalists work as they intend to. In this regard, the choice for live talk shows is quite eloquent. The two popular programs of this channel are "al-Ittijah al-Moua'kis" (Opposed Directions) and "Arraï wa arraï al-oukhra" (the opinion and the other's opinion). The now famous animator of the former show, Fayçal al-Qassim often tackles with controversial subjects like religion, relationships with Israel, islamism. Opposition movements had found the tribune to expose their views. Very few subjects are tabooed : the legitimacy of a regime or even religion are often debated. The movement has been impulsed and newcomers on the market will have to follow the same motto :
"Al-Jazeera's reputation for controversy while operating out of Doha rather than a European capital represents a breakthrough in media-related development in the Middle East. Along with LBC and the pay-TV provider, Orbit, Al-Jazeera has accelerated a trend towards live and compelling talk-show programming that has obliged the older channels to keep up with the competition."
Becoming more and more reliable for its audience, al-Jazeera has impulsed a new dynamic within media in the Middle East. Competitors have to take this into account, like the lastcomer el-Arrabyya, from Saudi Arabia did in March 2003.
Another turning point for the
channel was 11/9. After the WTO bombing, al-Jazeera was the only channel to
cover the US intervention in Afghanistan on the ground. Thus, it has been
the only window of the world inside the conflict. What is more, it was the
first media to be in possession of Ben Laden's videotapes. Last february,
as Colin Powell was trying to make a link between Ben Laden and Saddam Hussein,
he announced the broadcat of a Ben Laden's video, four hours before its effective
broadcast.
Last March and April, the US and English intervention in Irak has led to a
major media competition for information and coverage. In a close future, as
el-Nawawy and Gher state it (Al-Jazeera: Bridging the East-West gap through
public discourse and media diplomacy).


Sources.
For this webreview, I have selected articles mostly exctracted from TBS Journal
which is one of the most complete review of academic papers on the subject.
The Transnational Broadcasting Studies focuses on cultural and sociopolitical
implications in technological development and, in particular, transnational
braodcasting. The TBS Journal is published by the Adham Center for Television
Journalism which is hosted by the American University of Cairo. The journal's
editorial advisory is composed of both mass communications scholars and professionals
in the field around the world (mainly Middle East, Europe and Asia). Another
source for this webreview was Satellite Realms published in 2000 by Naomi
Sakr (see note 1), which has soon become one of the main reference for transntional
media in the Middle East.
Through this webreview, we will consider the effects of the introduction
of al-Jazeera within the market of satellite TV, before regarding
how it influences domestic politics
(and especially the opinions about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict).
A noticeable article about the official
reaction toward al-Jazeera's news coverage has also been selected.
Then, we will deal with al-Jazeera's war coverage and how it manages to be
objective in such a context. Eventually, we will present an article that seeks
al-Jazeera's potential for a real
dialog between the West and the Arab World.
