What is Creationism?
by Mark Isaak
Copyright © 2000-2002
[Article: May 30, 2000]
[Links Updated: December 12, 2002]

Contents
The Creation/Evolution Continuum in Christian Creationism
Non-Christian Creationism
o Not Easily Classifiable Positions
o "Scientific" Creationism from Other Religions
o Creation Beliefs of Other Cultures
Further Reading
Acknowledgements and References
Despite
many people's tendency to think of all creationists in one group and
all evolutionists in another, "creationism" refers to a wide range of
beliefs. This article gives a brief introduction to creationist
positions. It tries to cover the breadth of
creationist beliefs (and a little of the variety of evolutionist
belief), but it gives little depth. In addition to the positions, it
lists some influential people, organizations, books, and periodicals
which espouse the positions. Interested readers may look up these
references. Also, a section near the end gives suggestions for further
reading. The differences between types of creationism are not
minor. Most of the creationist beliefs described below are mutually
exclusive, and often their differences are as great as their
differences with evolution. Many creationists disagree as much with
other creationists as they do with evolutionists. Morris, for example,
devotes the last 20% of his book Scientific Creationism to attacks on other forms of creationism (Morris 1985).
Part 1
of this article examines varieties of Christian Creationism, because
Christianity in its various forms is by far the most prevalent religion
in the United States. (Creationism in any form is a relatively minor
force in other parts of the world.) Since creationism grades gradually
into evolution, part 1 also considers evolutionary beliefs. Part 2
considers non-Christian creationism and some other views of origins.
Creationist ideas through history and non-creationist anti-evolutionism
are not covered here (but see the "Further Reading" section).
Part 1: The Creation/Evolution Continuum in Christian Creationism
Creation
and evolution are not a dichotomy, but ends of a continuum (see
figure), and most creationist and evolutionist positions may be fit
along this continuum (Scott 1999). The successive steps labelled in the figure are described below.
CREATION
o Flat Earthers
o Geocentrists
o Young Earth Creationists
(Omphalos)
o Old Earth Creationists
(Gap Creationism)
(Day-Age Creationism)
(Progressive Creationism)
(Intelligent Design Creationism)
o Evolutionary Creationists
o Theistic Evolutionists
o Methodological Materialistic Evolutionists
o Philosophical Materialistic Evolutionists
EVOLUTION
Flat Earthers
Flat Earthers believe that the earth is flat and is covered by a solid
dome or firmament. Waters above the firmament were the source of Noah's
flood. This belief is based on a literal reading of the Bible, such as
references to the "four corners of the earth" and the "circle of the
earth." Few people hold this extreme view, but some do.
International Flat Earth Society, Box 2533, Lancaster, CA.
Charles K. Johnson
Geocentrism
Geocentrists accept a spherical earth but deny that the sun is the
centre of the solar system or that the earth moves. As with flat-earth
views, the water of Noah's flood came from above a solid firmament. The
basis for their belief is a literal reading of the Bible. "It is not an
interpretation at all, it is what the words say." (Willis 2000)
Both flat-earthers and geocentrists reflect the cosmological views of
ancient Hebrews. Geocentrism is not common today, but one geocentrist
(Tom Willis) was instrumental in revising the Kansas elementary school
curriculum to remove references to evolution, earth history, and
science methodology.
Biblical Astronomer, Cleveland, OH
http://www.biblicalastronomer.org/
Gerardus Bouw
Creation Science Association for Mid-America, Cleveland, MO.
http://www.csama.org/
Tom Willis
Young-Earth Creationism
Young Earth Creationists (YEC) claim a literal interpretation of the
Bible as a basis for their beliefs. They believe that the earth is 6000
to 10,000 years old, that all life was created in six literal days,
that death and decay
came as a result of Adam & Eve's Fall, and that geology must be
interpreted in terms of Noah's Flood. However, they accept a spherical
earth and heliocentric solar system. Young-Earth Creationists
popularized the modern movement of scientific creationism by taking the ideas of George McCready Price, a Seventh Day Adventist, and publishing them in The Genesis Flood (Whitcomb & Morris 1961). YEC is probably the most influential brand of creationism today.
Institute for Creation Research (ICR), El Cajon, CA.
http://www.icr.org/
Henry Morris (president emeritus), John D. Morris (president), Duane
Gish, Steven A. Austin, Larry Vardiman, Kenneth B. Cumming, Andrew
Snelling, ...
Whitcomb, John C. & Henry M. Morris, The Genesis Flood (The Presbyterian and Reformed Publishing Co., Philadelphia, PA, 1961)
Morris, Henry M., Scientific Creationism (Master Books, Green Forest, AR, 1974, 1985)
newsletter: Acts & Facts (includes Back to Genesis and Impact)
Answers in Genesis (AIG), Florence, KY.
http://www.answersingenesis.org/
Ken Ham
periodical: Creation Ex Nihilo
Creation Research Society (CRS), St. Joseph, MO.
http://www.creationresearch.org/
D. Russell Humphreys, Wayne Friar, Donald B. DeYoung, Eugene F. Chaffin
periodical: Creation Research Society Quarterly
Creation Science Evangelism, Pensacola, FL.
http://www.drdino.com/
Kent Hovind
Carl Baugh
Creation Evidences Museum, Glen Rose, TX.
Omphalos
The Omphalos argument, first expounded in a book of that name by Philip Henry Gosse (1857),
argues that the universe was created young but with the appearance of
age, indeed that an appearance of age is necessary. This position
appears in some contemporary young earth creationist writing. For
example, Whitcomb & Morris (1961, p. 232) argue that earth's
original soils were created appearing old. The position is sometimes
satirized by suggesting that the universe was created last week with
only an appearance of older history.
Old Earth Creationism
Old-Earth Creationists accept the evidence for an ancient earth but
still believe that life was specially created by God, and they still
base their beliefs on the Bible. There are a few different ways of
accommodating their religion with science.
American Scientific Affiliation, Ipswich, MA.
(This groups has mostly OEC members, but it doesn't turn away members
and has some YEC and Theistic Evolutionist members, too.)
http://www.asa3.org/index.html
periodical: Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith
Gap Creationism (also known as Restitution Creationism)
This view says that there was a long temporal gap between Genesis 1:1 and Genesis 1:2, with God recreating the world in 6 days after the gap. This allows both an ancient earth and a Biblical special creation.
Armstrong, Herbert W., Mystery of the Ages. Dodd, Mead, New York, 1985.
Jimmy Swaggart
Day-Age Creationism
Day-age creationists interpret each day of creation as a long period of
time, even thousands or millions of years. They see a parallel between
the order of events presented in Genesis 1 and the order accepted by
mainstream science. Day-Age Creationism was more popular than Gap
Creationism in the 19th and early 20th centuries.
Anonymous, Life--How Did It Get Here? By Evolution or Creation? (Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of New York, Brooklyn, NY, 1985)
Progressive Creationism
Progressive Creationism is the most common Old-Earth Creationism view
today. It accepts most of modern physical science, even viewing the Big
Bang as evidence of the creative power of God, but rejects much of
modern biology. Progressive Creationists generally believe that God
created "kinds" of organisms sequentially, in the order seen in the
fossil record, but say that the newer kinds are specially created, not
genetically related to older kinds.
Reasons To Believe, Pasadena, CA.
http://www.reasons.org/
Hugh Ross
Intelligent Design Creationism
Intelligent Design Creationism descended from Paley's argument that God's design could be seen in life (Paley 1803).
Modern IDC still makes appeals to the complexity of life and so varies
little from the substance of Paley's argument, but the arguments have
become far more technical, delving into microbiology and mathematical
logic. In large part, Intelligent Design Creationism is used today
as an umbrella anti-evolution position under which creationists of all
flavours may unite in an attack on scientific methodology in general (CRSC, 1999). A common tenet of IDC is that all beliefs about evolution equate to philosophical materialism.
Discovery Institute, Seattle, WA.,
Centre for Renewal of Science and Culture (CRSC)
http://www.discovery.org/csc/
Phillip Johnson, Michael Behe, William Dembski, Paul Nelson, Jonathan Wells, Stephen C. Meyer.
periodical: Origins & Design
Behe, Michael, Darwin's Black Box (Free Press, NY, 1996)
Dembski, William, The Design Inference (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1998)
Johnson, Phillip, Reason in the Balance (Inter-Varsity, Downers Grove, IL, 1995)
Davis, Percival & D. H. Kenyon, Of Pandas and People (Haughton, Dallas, TX, 1989)
Evolutionary Creationism
Evolutionary Creationism differs from Theistic Evolution only in its
theology, not in its science. It says that God operates not in the
gaps, but that nature has no existence independent of His will. It
allows interpretations consistent with both a literal Genesis and
objective science, allowing, for example, that the events of creation
occurred, but not in time as we know it, and that Adam was not the
first biological human but the first spiritually aware one.
Schneider, Susan, 1984. Evolutionary creationism: Torah solves the problem of missing links.
http://www.orot.com/ec.html
Theistic Evolution
Theistic Evolution says that God creates through evolution. Theistic
Evolutionists vary in beliefs about how much God intervenes in the
process. It accepts most or all of modern science, but it invokes God
for some things outside the realm of science, such as the creation of
the human soul. This position is promoted by the Pope and taught at
mainline Protestant seminaries.
Teilhard de Chardin, Pierre, The Phenomenon of Man (HarperCollin, San Francisco, 1959, 1980)
Methodological Materialistic Evolution
Materialistic Evolution differs from Theistic Evolution in saying that
God does not actively interfere with evolution. It is not necessarily
atheistic, though; many Materialistic Evolutionists believe that God
created evolution, for example. Materialistic evolution may be divided
into methodological and philosophical materialism. Methodological
materialism limits itself to describing the natural world with natural
causes; it says nothing at all about the supernatural, neither
affirming nor denying its existence or its role in life.
Gould, Stephen J., Rock of Ages: Science and Religion in the Fullness of Life (Ballantine Publishing Group, NY, 1999)
Philosophical Materialistic Evolution
Philosophical materialism says that the supernatural does not exist. It
says that not only is evolution a natural process, but so is everything
else.
Richard Dawkins
William Provine
Part 2: Non-Christian Creationism
Not Easily Classifiable Positions
There are some positions on origins which don't fit cleanly in the
continuum given above. Nor are they based on religion (although the
Raelian position is the basis for a religion). They have little
influence, but they are worth noting as illustrations of the variety of
beliefs which people hold.
Raelians
The Raelians believe that life was created by scientists from another
planet. The scientists continue to visit earth and were mistaken for
gods.
http://www.rael.org/
Rael, The True Face of God (The Raelian Foundation, 1998)
Panspermia
Panspermia is the position that primitive life, in the form of bacteria
or other microbes, was carried to earth from other star systems. Other
life evolved from there.
Hoyle, Fred & Chandra Wickramsinghe, Evolution from Space: A Theory of Cosmic Creationism (Simon & Schuster, NY, 1981)
http://www.panspermia.org/
Catastrophic Evolution
This position says that evolution occurred suddenly, driven by extreme, planet-wide catastrophes.
Velikovsky, Immanuel, Earth In Upheaval (Pocket Books, New York, 1955)
"Scientific" Creationism from Other Religions
Islamic Creationism
Contemporary Islam has a greater tendency to literalism than
Christianity does. The Koran is taken by almost all Muslims as the
direct and unaltered word of Allah, and Genesis is considered a
corrupted version of God's message. However, the creation accounts in
the Koran are more vague and are spread among several surahs (chapters)
(2:109-111, 7:52-57, 16:1-17, 40:66-70, 41:9-12, 42:28, 65:12), allowing a range of interpretations similar to those described in part 1. Most Islamic Young Earth Creationism is imported directly from the USA. (Edis 1994)
Vedic Creationism
Hinduism speaks of a very ancient earth. One book influenced by Hindu
belief argues that anatomically modern humans have existed for billions
of years.
Cremo, Michael A. & Richard L. Thompson, Forbidden Archaeology: The Hidden History of the Human Race (Govardhan Hill, Inc., San Diego, CA, 1994)
American Indian Creationism
The term "American Indian" refers to hundreds of groups with at least
as many stories of creation. Deloria has put together a version of
creationism which takes from many Native American cultures. It says
that originally there was no essential difference between people and
animals, that giant people and megafauna once coexisted, and that
people and animals shrunk in stature after the golden age came to an
end with the earth being ravaged by fire from volcanism.
American Indian Creationism has also come into American politics over
the Kennewick Man. Kennewick Man is a 9000-year-old Caucasian fossil
man found in Washington state. The fossil is of great interest to
anthropologists because of its great age and its anatomical differences
from indigenous North Americans. According to the creation beliefs of
the Umatilla Indians, though, their ancestors have always been there,
so Kennewick Man must be an Indian ancestor. Thus, under the Native
American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act, the fate of his
remains should be for the Umatilla to determine (Morell 1998).
Members of the Asatru religion have also filed suit to stop the
repatriation on the grounds that Kennewick Man's possible European
ancestry is important to their own religious views (Anon., 1999). A court decision in favor of the Umatilla could be the
only Federal legal decision in decades to support one particular view of creationism over another.
Deloria, Vine Jr., Red Earth, White Lies: Native Americans and the Myth of Scientific Fact (Scribner, New York, 1995)
Creation Beliefs of Other Cultures
There are hundreds, if not thousands, of creation myths among the
peoples of the world. Many Christians object to having their beliefs
called myths, but a myth is simply a story which is (or has been)
considered true and sacred by a group of people. Other cultures believe
their creation myths for exactly the same sorts of reasons that
Christians believe theirs.
There are far too many different creation myths to give more than a
sampling here. Only a few myths exemplifying some common themes will be
given. Unless otherwise noted, all examples come from Sproul (1979).
Cosmic Egg (example: Finnish)
A teal flew over the primeval waters but could find no place to land.
The Mother of the Water raised her knee above the water, and the teal
made a nest on it. It laid six golden eggs and one iron egg, and then
it sat warming them. The heat became so intense that the Mother of the
Water twitched her knee. The eggs dislodged and broke. The earth formed
from one half of a shell, and the sky from the other half. The sun
formed from the top half of one yolk, and the moon from the top half of
the white. Stars and clouds also formed from parts of the egg.
Separation of Earth and Sky (example: New Hebrides)
Naareau the Elder created the earth, but the sky and the earth clove
together with darkeness between them. Naareau the Younger, with a
spell, created a slight cleft between earth and sky. He created a bat
and told it to look around. The Bat reported finding a Company of Fools
and Deaf Mutes. Naareau crawled in the cleft and, with the Bat as his
guide, went to the people. Naareau told them to push up, and the sky
was lifted a little, but they could lift it only so high. Naareau
summoned Riiki, the conger eel, and told it to push up on the sky
against the land. While Riiki pushed and Naareau sang, Great Ray,
Turtle, and Octopus tore at the roots of the sky. The sky was pushed
high and the land sank. The Company of Fools and Deaf Mutes were left
swimming in the sea; they became the sea creatures. (von Franz,
Marie-Louise, 1986. Patterns of Creativity Mirrored in Creation Myths. Spring Publications, Inc., Dallas, TX, pp. 151-154, 170)
Creation from a Primordial Being (example: Norse)
The heat from Muspell, the firey area to the south, met with the cold
from icy Ginnungagap in the north and created the frost giant Ymir. A
man and woman were born from his armpits, and one of his legs mated
with the other to make a son; these began a race of frost ogres. Some
melting ice became the cow Audhumla, whose teats gave rivers of milk.
The man Buri appeared from a block of ice which Audhumla licked. His
descendents included the gods Odin, Vili, and Ve. They slew Ymir, and
his blood flooded and killed all people except the giant Bergelmir and
his family. The three gods turned Ymir's body into the earth and his
blood into the surrounding seas. His bones and teeth became mountains
and rocks, his skull became the sky, his brains became clouds, etc.
They made the sun, moon, and stars out of sparks from Muspell. The
three gods made a man and woman (Ask and Embla) from two fallen trees.
Odin gave them life, Vili gave them intelligence, and Ve gave them
speech, sight, and hearing. They made a stronghold, Midgard, out of
Ymir's eyebrows to protect them from the giants outside. (Sturluson,
Snorri (transl. by Jean I. Young), 1954. The Prose Edda, University of California Press, Berkeley, pp. 31-37)
Earth Diver; Dualism (example: Huron)
In the beginning, there was only a wide sea. A divine woman fell from
the upper world. Two loons saw her falling and together caught her to
keep her from drowning. They called for help from other animals. One of
the animals to come was tortoise, and he accepted the woman onto his
back. The animals decided the woman should have earth to live on, and
tortoise directed them all to dive to the bottom of the sea to bring up
some earth. Many tried but failed. Finally toad dived; he came back
exhausted and almost dead, but he had some mud in his mouth. Tortoise
gave it to the woman, who placed it around the tortoise's shell. It
extended on all sides, forming a vast country. The woman was pregnant
with twins, Tijuskeha and Tawiskarong. Tawiskarong, the evil one, did
not consent to be born in the usual manner, but broke through his
mother's side, killing her. Her body was buried, and from it came many
forms of vegetation. Tijuskeha created useful and innocent animals, and
Tawiskarong created fierce and monsterous ones. Tijuskeha reduced these
in size when he discovered them. The two brothers eventually duelled;
Tijuskeha prevailed and killed his brother, but Tawiskarong's spirit
appeared, said he had gone to the far west, and said that all men would
go to the west when they died.
Emergence (example: Lipan Apache)
In the beginning, all people lived in darkness in the lower world. They
held a council and decided to send someone above to find whether there
was another world. First they sent wind. Water had covered the earth
originally, but the wind rolled it back, and land appeared. The people
next sent up Crow, but Crow stayed to eat the dead fish that had been
exposed and didn't report back. They sent Beaver next, but he stayed to
build dams in the streams and didn't report back, either. Next they
sent Badger, who reported back that there was dry land up there. The
people next sent four men to prepare the world above, which was flat
and empty. These four men chose one named Mirage from whom to make
things as we know them now. They formed Mirage into the shape of a
ball, and of that ball made all things of this earth. Those people went
around making hills and mountains, lightning and springs, etc. Then the
people of the lower world ascended. First the animal and plant people
came out. They moved around the edge of the earth clockwise, and
different tribes stopped at different places. The real humans came out
after them and likewise migrated to different places. Sun and Moon were
originally with the people, but they later went ahead and separated.
Creation by Spoken Word; Repeated Creation (example: Quiche Maya)
At first there was only sky above and water below. The gods Sovereign
Plumed Serpent and Heart of Sky spoke together, joined their thoughts,
and conceived of creation. Simply by their word, they brought it forth.
First they created and formed earth and vegetation; then they created
animals and gave them homes. They told the animals to speak and gave
them different cries, but the animals didn't speak like people. So the
animals were appointed to serve by their flesh being eaten. The gods
tried making a human body out of earth and mud, but it could not turn
its head, and it crumbled in water, so they gave up on it. Next they
created manikins out of carved wood. These people talked like men, and
they multiplied and populated the earth, but there was nothing in their
hearts, and they did not remember their creators. Heart of Sky devised
a flood for them. A rain of resin came from the sky; animals attacked
them, and even their cooking pots and grinding stones turned on them.
The manikins were destroyed, but some of their descendants are today's
monkeys. Finally, just before the first dawn, before the sun and stars
appeared, four men were made from corn meal and water. These people saw
everywhere and understood everything, and they gave thanks for being
made. The creators thought the people would become like gods
themselves, so they clouded the men's vision to its present state. Four
women were made next, and these eight people became the parents of the
Quiche people. (Tedlock, Dennis (transl.), 1985. Popol Vuh. Simon & Schuster, New York)
breadth |
Largeur, étendue |
Flat-earthers |
Substantif désignant ceux croyant que la Terre est plate |
decay |
Décomposition, déliquescence, |
Theistic evolutionism |
Evolutionnisme théologique |
Deity |
Divinité, dieu |
A supreme Being |
un être suprême |
To be fit |
(ici) être placé |
|