Religious variable in Europe

 

 

By FRANCK FREGOSI.

 

S

ome people consider that the Christian values are the fundamental values of Europe.

In saying that, one forgets that Europe is crossed by a lot of values coming from different traditions and religions.

We can observe contrasts in the european religious geography.

In deed, the Church itself is pluralistic with the presence of the Orthodox Christians, the Catholics, and the Protestants. Moreover, Islam is present in Europe since the eighth century (it is not a new phenomenon as a lot of people think!)

It is obvious that religion plays a role in Europe . But, which is its place?

Is it relevant to speak about a religious Europe ?

We can wonder this question because, even the religious phenomenon seems to take a larger and larger place in society, process of secularization is undeniable.

Europe is both secularized and pluralistic. There is a diversified range of religion.

There are several ways to feel religious, we have got several options.

What is sure is that religious institutions have lost their social seating. Their ability of intervention has been reduced.

However, there is still a religious membership. But it doesn’t give information about a kind of behaviour. Is it a practising person or not? How?

We have to measure the degree of involvement in the religion.

In northern Europe , there is a great Lutheran tradition but the “religious integration” rate is very low.

In other words, the official membership is very high but it has not any effect on a day-to-day basis.

“On paper”, the Church predominates, but not in the society. Let’s quote that Latin Europe resists to secularization, and maintains a Catholicism which isn’t only an identifying one.

In Spain , Catholicism remains dominant but there are waves of secularization too.

In Europe, on average, there are twenty per cent of churchgoers.

The religious belief doesn’t disappear and borrow different forms. That is done not inevitably through the Church but within small groups.

 

In 1997, Roland Campiche, a religions’ sociologist, made a poll to 60000 young Europeans (Christians were in the majority) to study their religious profile. This survey provides a typology of the religious behaviours:

 

The “non-religious

 

They represent 23% of the sample. There are above all men. They don’t define themselves in relation to religion. The latter is external to their lives. Among them, 35% say they belong to a church. This is a sociological membership, they aren’t churchgoers.

They consider that “Good and Evil” aren’t determined by immutable principles but by context.

 

The religious” (11%)

 

For them, religious membership is the central vector of their identity.

4/5 of this sample attend services, they have a lot of links with the institution, they take part in the latter (scouts, prayer’s groups …)

88% of them declare they believe in a personified God.

And when we ask them the question: “how do you define yourself?”

They answer: “We are religious”

According to them, religion is fundamental. For 85%, people should hand this value down to their children.

In this category, women are in the majority (57%)

This group is of rural origin and comes from Catholic countries (Ireland for instance)

They have strict values and they are politically more conservative.

We note that one third of young Europeans have absolute positions: They are either religious or non-religious.

 

Heterodox believers” (10%)

 

This is a socially heterogeneous group.

Ø      They can add beliefs to their original religion.

Ex: a Catholic who might believe in reincarnation. The level of adherence of this kind of believers is as strong as the religious ones.

It is a kind of “do-it-yourself religion”. There is no strict denominational context. The believers are seeking well-being, and don’t inevitably join an institution.

For the individual, this way of believing is not inconsistent. There is no incompatibility.

This “do-it-yourself religion” has always existed, but earlier in society, there was a religious more coherent whole. This pattern is close to the “religious” one, but “heterodox believers” don’t practice their religion on a day-to-day basis.

 

They accentuate the idea of the hereafter (question which is increasingly to be found in different religious groups. Why? Maybe because of uncertainty. The idea that “the times have come” is growing even in Islam and the Salafist movements)

 

The secular humanists” (10%)

 

They are close to the non-religious. They consider that the Church has to take part in public issues. They trust in the Church and its discourse (concerning the Third World, racism…)

They are rather to be found in a protestant environment (United Kingdom, Denmark…), but in Spain too (though it is a catholic country)

According to them, the Church is still legitimate.

 

The irregular churchgoers” (23%)

 

They represent one fourth of young Europeans. They subscribe to some beliefs but they are selective.

Monthly practice rate: 36%

Ex: Jews called “The Jews of Kippur”; Catholics who go to Church for Christmas.

They are “festive” churchgoers. For the believer, the rites are more important than the religious conviction in itself.

Kinds of population: Women are in the majority (62%). They come from the country and small cities.

 

Ritualistic people” (24%)

 

They resort to the original church only at certain moments in their life (birth, marriage, death)

They only need a “technique” (only 8% believe in a personified God)

They think we need rites “which span the ages of life”

The religion is seen as a technical mechanism. They have a ritual approach to it.

 

 

 

 

These different categories show how differently people comprehend religion. They can have regular or irregular practice.

We may observe thanks to these samples the plurality of positioning facing religion.

One religion, but several types of believers.