Enron’s
collapse
After the
general enthusiasm during the eighties and the nineties, the first hints
dysfunction from 2002’s summer. Enron’s failure was the most conclusive example
that the American model of capitalism – considered up till now as infallible,
may present weaknesses.
Trying to
understand what happened reveals a murky and unclear system, used by the
bibbest American firms.
During the 1990s
Enron became the largest trader of electricity. The technique adopted by Enron
was to create series of off-the-books partnerships which, on the one hand, hid
its financial problems and, the other hand, allowed a number of its executives
to increase their profits.
Moreover, Enron had influence
in the federal government: over fifty high members of the Bush administration
had meaningful ties with the energy company. An other point underlined by the
Enron bankrupcy is a fear work climate on the employees: it was not good to
express their criticism.
Not only the
employees lost their jobs, but they also lost their money and their pension.
Indeed, with the aim to ensure the sucess of the company, their had entrusted
their savings with Enron. The whole medias grabbed the scandal. It had become a
shame to have been involved in the Enron company. During the many litigations,
an other scandal (in the scandal) occured: Enron and the auditor were not
independant at all. Enron’s collapse revealed too the nature of the relation
between the corporation and the politics: a corruption like in the Third-World
states. The difference consists in the legality of these methods in the US,
even if they remain distressing and shameful.
Enron’s fiasco was
the first sign of a flaw in the system; nevertheless it did not represent the
end of it, but the beginning of a new challenge: to succeed in reconciling
business and integrity.